© 2022 KMUW
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Crime and Courts

Defense Opens Trial Saying No Anti-Muslim Bomb Plot In Kansas, Just FBI Manipulation

garden_city_terrorism.jpg
Sedgwick County Sheriff's Office
/
From left: Gavin Wright, Curtis Allen and Patrick Stein are accused of plotting to bomb a Garden City apartment complex home to many Somali immigrants.

Federal prosecutors told jurors Thursday that the three men charged with plotting to bomb an apartment complex and mosque in western Kansas to kill Somali immigrants were motivated by their hatred of Muslims.

“They wanted to send the message that Muslims are not welcome here -- not in Garden City, not in Kansas, not in America,” prosecutor Risa Berkower said.

Her opening statement in the Wichita trial laid out a case that only the work of federal agents stopped the trio from carrying out a bombing the day after the Nov. 8, 2016, presidential election.

Patrick Stein, Gavin Wright and Curtis Allen were arrested in October 2016 and charged with conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction.

A paid FBI informant recorded the men calling Muslims “cockroaches” and talking about the prospect of a “bloodbath” to reverse damage they believed immigrants had done to the country. In the recordings, the men discuss a plan to bomb a mosque and apartment complex in Garden City predominantly occupied by Somali Muslims.

Defense attorneys argued the recordings don’t reflect a conspiracy, just “banter,” and constitutionally protected free speech. Each defendant has his own legal team.

Kari Schmidt, representing Wright, said that the defendants' meetings at Wright’s business were “complaint and bull sessions.” While there was violent language used in those meetings, she said, “there was absolutely nothing wrong with that.”

us_courthouse_wichita.png
Credit Sean Sandefur / KMUW/File photo
/
KMUW/File photo
The trial at the federal courthouse in Wichita is expected to last six weeks.

The prosecutors said the defendants were doing more than just talking, that they took action that included the construction of a detonator for a bomb.

“That detonator wasn’t just words,” Berkower said. “That detonator was action."

The defense was denied a request to include jurors from counties in western Kansas, which has more Trump voters than Wichita and the surrounding counties where the jurors have been pulled from.

U.S. District Judge Eric Melgren also ruled before trial that the defense would need more evidence that the men were not inclined to commit the crime before they can argue entrapment.

Attorneys for the three men argued Thursday that the FBI went too far in setting up a case against the defendants. Richard Federico, Allen’s lawyer, said that the real victims were the defendants, who he said were targeted by the FBI.

“The FBI created and directed all of this,” Federico said.

The portrayal of Dan Day, the paid FBI informant who recorded the defendants, is key for both the prosecution and the defense. Prosecutors presented Day as a concerned citizen and a hero. The defense said he was broke and essentially a bounty hunter who exploited the defendants’ fears for a payday.

Defense attorneys for all three men argued the case in similar ways. But attorneys for Wright and Allen both tried to play down their clients' individual roles. Wright’s attorney said that while the meetings took place at Wright's business, he was often absent. Allen’s lawyer said that Wright and Stein had a close relationship and often left Allen out.

“It was the two of them working together a lot more than Mr. Allen,” Federico said.

Attorneys also portrayed Wright and Allen as lonely men whose desire for camaraderie was exploited by the FBI.

Prosecutors moved to paint that interpretation as absurd.

“Think about what the FBI’s options were,” Berkower said, “when they learned that these three men were highly motivated to kill Muslims and were taking steps to do just that.”

The men are also charged with violating the targeted Somali Muslims' rights guaranteed by the Fair Housing Act — to live in their homes without being attacked or intimidated because of their race, religion or their country of birth. The prosecution said it would use recordings from the defendants to show that they were motivated by a hatred of Muslims.

Stein’s attorney, James Pratt, said the context of the statements -- the contentious 2016 election season -- matters. He described political coverage at the time as “chaos news” that further divided the country.

“Hate ruled the day,” Pratt said. “Left hating right. Right hating left."

The trial is expected to last six weeks. If the men are found guilty they could face life in prison.

--

Stephan Bisaha reports on education for KMUW in Wichita and the Kansas News Service, a collaboration of KMUW, Kansas Public Radio, KCUR and High Plains Public Radio covering health, education and politics. Follow him on Twitter @SteveBisaha. Kansas News Service stories and photos may be republished at no cost with proper attribution and a link back to the original post.