State Offers Alternative To Closing Schools In Kansas School Funding Lawsuit

Your browser doesn’t support HTML5 audio

alamosbasement

Kansas Supreme Court justices are mulling how to respond in a lawsuit over school funding. Justices previously said they could close schools if funding disparities among districts aren’t reduced. But as Stephen Koranda reports, an attorney yesterday offered an alternative option.

An attorney representing the state, Stephen McAllister, says if justices rule against the state they could strike down just part of the Kansas school funding system and let classes start in the fall.

“That is not an attractive option to the state, but it is more attractive than striking down the entire system,” McAllister said.

McAllister says schools could function without all of their normal funding while lawmakers decide how to respond. Alan Rupe, an attorney representing schools, says that could cost districts 25 percent of their state funding and districts would have little time to prepare.

“It has disastrous consequences. I would suggest some other method that gives the Legislature more specific guidance,” Rupe said.

Justices could hand down a decision in the lawsuit in the coming weeks.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
Stephen Koranda is the managing editor of the Kansas News Service, based at KCUR. He has nearly 20 years of experience in public media as a reporter and editor.
  1. Kansas AG Says School Funding Law Fixes Constitutional Flaws
  2. Wichita Public Schools Board To Continue Discussion Over Funding Gap
  3. Kansas Supreme Court To Hear School Funding Arguments
  4. Justices Have Tough Questions In Kansas School Funding Lawsuit